30-Second Verdict
The PAX Mini 2 wins — 7.5 to 6.3 — and it costs £40 more, which is the whole argument in one line. Both are pure conduction, both are under 91 grams, both will get a small amount of flower into you over roughly the same handful of minutes. What the £40 buys is everything either side of that: the object in your hand, the cleaning, the charging cable, and the fact that no part of it is quietly waiting to crack.
Flowermate Aura: 6.3/10 | £69.00 PAX Mini 2: 7.5/10 | £109.00
Buy the Flowermate Aura if: - Pen-shape is the actual requirement — a shirt pocket, a handbag pen slot, anywhere a biro goes - You want herb, concentrate and oil pods in the box at £69, which nothing else does at this money - You want a published battery figure rather than a manufacturer who won't quote one - Losing it, breaking it or leaving it somewhere should cost you a takeaway, not a week's shopping
Buy the PAX Mini 2 if: - You want the better vaporiser and can find another £40 - Build quality matters: anodised aluminium and a flat metal mouthpiece against plastic that cracks - You want a twenty-two-second heat-up, lip-sensing and motion standby rather than five clicks and a colour - Cleaning it should take minutes and involve no anxiety at all
Quick Specs Face-Off:
| Flowermate Aura | PAX Mini 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Heating | Conduction, stainless chamber | Conduction, stainless oven with 3D screen |
| Temperature | 3 presets, ~185–215°C | 4 modes — 180 / 193 / 204 / 215°C, no degree readout |
| Heat-up | ~30–45 seconds | ~22 seconds |
| Battery | 2600mAh sealed, 6–8 sessions | Sealed, capacity unpublished — 7–8 short sessions, about an hour of use |
| Charging | Micro-USB, ~3 hours | USB-C magnetic dock, ~90 minutes |
| Bowl | ~0.3g | 0.5g full, 0.25g with the half-pack lid |
| Weight | ~90 g | 89 g |
| Mouthpiece | Plastic (cracks) | Flat metal |
| Warranty | 2 years | 2 years, 3 with registration |
| Price | £69.00 | £109.00 |
The Hook
Manchester to Dublin is fifty-five minutes in the air whoever sells you the seat.
The budget carrier gets you there for the price of a big shop. The seat doesn't recline, the tray table has an advert on it, boarding is a scrum at gate 41 conducted entirely in the rain, and the bag you assumed was included is £34 you find out about at the desk. But the runway is the same runway, and fifty-five minutes later you're in Dublin having spent sixty-nine quid. Nobody boards a budget flight expecting to enjoy it. They board it because it goes.
The flag carrier flies the identical route in the identical time. What you're buying is the bit around the flying: a boarding process someone designed on purpose, a cabin that isn't shouting at you, a bag in the fare, a crew who have been told that the passenger is not the enemy. The flight is not better. The flight cannot be better. Everything else is, and the invoice reflects it.
The Flowermate Aura is the budget carrier. The PAX Mini 2 is the flag carrier. Same short-haul route, two fares £40 apart.
I called the Aura a BIC pen in its review and the PAX Mini 2 the AirPods of vaporisers. Set those aside. What matters here is that both are pure conduction in a body under 91 grams, sold to the same buyer for the same reason: this thing must not be noticed.
One warning before we board. Only one of these two has flown the site's standard route — the PAX Mini 2 has been through the full Jack Herer and Wedding Cake control, and the Aura hasn't. That changes what the strain section can honestly claim, and I'll say exactly where.
We stock the Aura at HerbVape.co.uk — details and pricing below.
Vapour Quality
Winner: PAX Mini 2 — 6.5/10 versus 5.0/10, and this is the closest the gap ever gets to feeling unfair to the cheaper device.
The Aura is pure conduction through a stainless chamber into a plastic mouthpiece, three fixed presets and no way between them. Preset 1 (~185°C) is thin but detectable, with what its review honestly logged as a faint synthetic warmth sitting behind the flavour — "the sort of thing you notice once and then try to forget." Preset 2 (~195°C) is the functional zone: visible vapour, reasonable extraction, adequate effects, and the only preset worth living in. Preset 3 (~215°C) clears the 0.3g chamber in two draws and stops pretending to be about taste. Conduction that size wants a mid-session stir. Its review's summary is the one I'd defend: the Aura doesn't reward technique, it rewards low expectations met consistently.
The PAX is also pure conduction, also stainless, also without a degree readout anywhere — four fixed modes at 180, 193, 204 and 215°C, communicated to you as modes rather than numbers. But it is, in its review's phrase, conduction done as well as conduction can be done at 89 grams. The 3D oven screen spreads heat more evenly than the original Mini's flat screen: fewer hot spots, more consistent extraction across the bowl, four draws with character at Mode 2. What it genuinely does better than the Aura is repeat itself — bowl after bowl, no technique variance, no surprises.
Neither is a flavour device and both reviews say so at length; the PAX's own points at a £75 convection pen twice before the halfway mark to prove it. A pound-for-pound flavour buyer should not be on this page at all. Between these two, though: the PAX hands you a strain's general character reliably and neutrally, and the Aura hands you it reliably unless the flower is delicate, in which case you get a general impression plus a hint of warm plastic.
The Strain Test, Side by Side
Here's the honest position, stated before anything else, because the strain test is the one part of this site that only works if nobody fudges it.
The PAX Mini 2 has run the house control. The Flowermate Aura hasn't. The Mini 2 went through Jack Herer and Wedding Cake from the same jars, the same grinder and the same scales as every other device here. The Aura's review predates that protocol and ran Papaya — a myrcene-led tropical hybrid — and a Noidecs T10:C10 balanced medical flower. There is no shared jar between these two devices. So what follows compares the PAX's control data against the Aura's results by terpene family, and where the Aura has no equivalent data, I say so rather than inventing it.
The dessert family — sweet, caryophyllene-and-myrcene-forward, forgiving. This is Wedding Cake's territory on the control, and it's where both devices are at their best, which is not a coincidence: hot walls and greasy sweet genetics want the same things. The PAX at Mode 1 gave vanilla and sweet cream from the first draw and thick for a device this small, sweet raw dough underneath, a cherry edge on the exhale, four draws without thinning. Mode 2 brought butter, then baked cake and warm dough, with pepper arriving late and welcome — four good draws. Its review's own verdict on that is the sentence that transfers cleanly to this comparison: rich rather than resolved, warm sweet cream as one satisfying thing rather than vanilla, butter and dough as three separate ones. The Aura's Papaya sits in the same family — myrcene dominant, linalool and caryophyllene behind, tropical sweetness over an earthy base — and behaves the same way one rung down. At preset 1 the papaya arrives as "a general fruitiness rather than the detailed mango-papaya layering you'd get through convection." At preset 2 the sweetness deepens, linalool adds a lavender calm, the indica asserts itself, four draws with building body effect. Both devices compress a sweet flower into one good thing instead of several nameable ones. The difference is that the PAX only compresses, and the Aura compresses and then adds something of its own on the way out. That's the plastic. It's also why the Aura's review tells you to pick sweet, terpene-heavy strains — partly because they survive basic conduction, and partly because they're loud enough to cover the mouthpiece.
The fragile family — terpinolene, pinene, bright citrus tops. This is Jack Herer, and this is where the missing control data actually costs the Aura something. The PAX has numbers: Mode 1 at 180°C gives pine needles and lemon peel on draw one, genuinely present if thin, citrus still behind them on draw two, handing over to green herb by three and warm dry herbs by four — four draws, two of them good, which its review calls the honest count. Mode 2 kills the bright end permanently and gives you well-defined black pepper instead, because pepper is the durable heart of that flower and hot walls have no trouble with it. And the presets are the real punishment: there is no 185°C to hide in, only Mode 1, Mode 2 and thirteen degrees of nothing between them. The Aura has never run Jack, so I can't tell you what its 185/195 pair does with terpinolene. What I can tell you is what its own review reports adjacent to it — the pinene in the Noidecs T10:C10 came through "subtle through plastic but present" at preset 1, and the review's explicit guidance is that delicate citrus and floral profiles do not survive the trip. Two devices with a ten- and thirteen-degree hole in exactly the wrong place, one of which has measured what falls into it.
The medical middle. Worth noting because it's where both stop being compromised and start being appropriate. The Aura's balanced T10:C10 at preset 1 was clean, piney and non-psychoactive — two gentle CBD-forward draws — with preset 2 bringing THC and CBD together for three draws of functional, unimpaired relief. The PAX's review makes the same argument off the back of the control: the oven is at its most controlled and most forgiving at Mode 1 and Mode 2, which is exactly where gentle repeatable daytime dosing lives. Neither can target a specific terpene activation point, which the temperature guide will show you matters. Both are fine if you're managing symptoms rather than auditioning terpenes.
The call: on sweet, loud, forgiving flower these two are separated by one grade and a mouthpiece. On anything fragile, the PAX has been measured and found politely wanting, and the Aura hasn't been measured at all — which, if you're buying for a delicate sativa, is its own answer. The device with the data isn't flattered by having it. The device without it isn't spared by not having it.
Design & Build
Winner: PAX Mini 2, by the widest margin on the card. 9/10 versus 5/10, and the four points are the entire fare gap made visible.
The PAX is 93 × 30.7 × 21.6mm of anodised aluminium that feels milled from a single block — no visible seams from the front, rounded edges shaped for a palm, subtle haptics that pulse when it's ready or when you change mode, an understated LED petal display. Its review called it the best-designed portable vaporiser it had held, and I'm not going to argue that down on behalf of a £69 pen. Its first-timer test came back EXCELLENT: Sarah called it "the little one" for three weeks before being told it had a name, needed no instructions and asked no questions.
The Aura's pen form is genuinely well executed — the metal body is better than £69 usually buys, slim, unbranded from a distance, and it survives pocket carry without scratching immediately. Then there's the mouthpiece, which is plastic, which cracks. Not might. Its review is unambiguous: forum reports run from weeks to months, Jake's lasted a week, and the material simply isn't durable enough for a part that gets heated repeatedly. It also gets unpleasantly warm from draw three. The herb pod's gasket loosens at 3–6 months on top. The Aura's Mum test came back MIXED — she pressed the button five times unprompted, then asked of the three-colour LED, "which colour am I supposed to want?"
This is the ancillary-fees category. The Aura's fare is £69 and the mouthpiece is the bag you didn't know wasn't included, at £5–10, on a repeating basis, forever.
Battery & Charging
Winner: Flowermate Aura — 7/10 versus 5/10, and it's the only category it wins outright.
It wins it on the number you can actually see. The Aura puts a stated 2600mAh into a 90-gram pen and gets 6–8 sessions per charge at preset 2 — a full evening, a weekend day out. PAX publishes no capacity at all for the Mini 2, and once you've used one you understand why: about an hour of real use, or seven to eight short three-minute sessions, with heavy users topping up between sessions. Motion-sensing standby helps, cooling between pulls and reheating when it detects movement, but its review's summary stands: no software trick fixes physics. Two devices quoting a similar session count, one of which will tell you what's in it.
The counter-argument is the plug, and it's a good one. The Aura charges over Micro-USB, in 2026, in three hours, via a cable the rest of the industry abandoned years ago — its own review files that under "silent embarrassment" and tells you to keep one in a drawer and guard it. The PAX charges over USB-C on a magnetic dock in about ninety minutes, off whatever's already in your pocket, car and desk. Neither recommends pass-through; neither battery comes out.
So the Aura carries more declared fuel and needs an increasingly archaeological cable to refuel, while the PAX carries an undeclared amount and refuels anywhere, twice as fast. Which of those annoys you more is genuinely personal, and this is the only place in the comparison where the £69 device holds the higher score.
Ease of Use
Winner: PAX Mini 2. 8/10 versus 7/10 — the narrowest gap on the card, and both of these are easy.
The Aura is five clicks on, five clicks off, three to cycle presets, green-blue-red LED, five-minute auto-shutoff so you can't leave it running. There's no learning curve because there's nothing to learn — and nothing to adjust: if ~185°C is too little and ~195°C is too much, you're stuck in a ten-degree gap with no middle. Experienced users feel that immediately; beginners never notice.
The PAX gets to the same place from the opposite direction — one button, four modes, lip-sensing that fires the heater as it touches your mouth, motion standby that reheats when you pick it up, twenty-two seconds cold to drawing. Its review said the interaction is so natural it barely feels like technology, and that's the difference: the Aura is simple because it's basic, the PAX is simple because someone did work. Both refuse you a degree readout. Only one makes that feel like a decision rather than a saving. Four modes described as mild, medium, strong and maximum are, as its review points out, a more honest interface for a beginner than a number they can't interpret.
The PAX's one tax is the pack. The oven holds 0.5g and conduction can't spread evenly across that much flower — you want the half-pack lid and 0.25g of a fine grind, every time, and the small oven opening rewards a steady hand. Tom found that out the hard way in the PAX review, loading a full half-gram and then complaining the flavour was weak. Read the lid. Use the lid.
Cleaning & Maintenance
Winner: PAX Mini 2 — 8/10 versus 5/10, and this one is about nerves as much as minutes.
The PAX's 3D oven screen is the most underrated thing about it: it lifts out cleanly and resists buildup where the original Mini's flat screen was a resin magnet that needed soaking, scraping and quiet swearing. Brush the oven and wipe every 3–4 sessions, ISO the screen and mouthpiece weekly, pipe cleaner through the vapour path monthly, seal ring every 6–12 months. The oven stains cosmetically and works fine. Crucially, the mouthpiece is flat metal — no glass to break, no plastic to crack.
The Aura's chamber is small, stainless and brushes out with the included tool, and the pod system keeps it slightly cleaner than a direct-load design would. Then you reach the mouthpiece again. It wants a brief, lukewarm ISO soak weekly — too hot or too long and the plastic degrades faster; too gentle or too rare and resin narrows the airpath. Its review puts the real cost plainly: every clean carries a small risk of the crack you're already expecting, so you clean it more often and more gently than you would glass. That isn't five minutes of work. It's five minutes of work with a hand on it.
Portability
Winner: PAX Mini 2 on score — 10/10 versus 9/10 — but read this one properly before you use it to decide.
These are the two most pocketable named-brand devices I've tested and the gram between them (89 versus ~90) is a rounding error. What differs is shape, and therefore where they hide. The PAX is a rounded aluminium block that fits a closed fist, a clutch bag, a shirt pocket or a coin pocket, reading from any distance as a small Bluetooth speaker or a sleek lighter — one of Sarah's friends took it for a lipstick and the rest have never noticed it in her bag. The Aura goes wherever a biro goes: shirt pocket, handbag pen slot, jacket, jeans. From two metres it's an e-cigarette. From five it's a pen.
Both reviews landed independently on the same distinction, and it's the sharpest line either produced: the Aura hides by being ordinary, the PAX hides by being premium. If the mission is "nobody must know what this is", the pen shape and its total lack of interestingness are the stronger play, and the Aura's review says flatly that for pure stealth-and-carry the Aura wins. If the mission is "small, and I'd quite like it to be lovely", the PAX takes it, and the extra point reflects that.
Value for Money
A dead heat: 6/10 apiece — the only tie on the card, and the most interesting number in this comparison.
Both reviews reached 6 by opposite routes. The Aura is £69 for triple-use pods, 2600mAh and a two-year warranty, which is fair on paper — until you add mouthpieces at £5–10 every few months and notice a £75 convection pen six quid up the page. Its review called £69 "an awkward middle": not cheap enough to be throwaway, not dear enough to be an investment. The PAX is £109 for a device its own review taxes at roughly thirty per cent for design and badge and says so out loud — call it thirty-odd quid of styling — with convection alternatives at £75 and at the same £109 both out-vapouring it.
Neither is good value in the abstract and both are honest about it. What changes between them is what your money is exposed to. £69 buys a device with a known failure point and an ongoing consumable. £109 buys a device with no known failure point, a metal mouthpiece, a three-year warranty if you register it, and a battery that needs feeding daily. That's not a value gap, it's a risk gap — which is exactly what the fare difference between two carriers on the same route always is. Scoring criteria are on the methodology page.
Score Comparison
| Category | Flowermate Aura | PAX Mini 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vapour Quality | 5.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Design & Build | 5.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Battery & Charging | 7.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Cleaning & Maintenance | 5.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Portability | 9.0/10 | 10/10 |
| Value for Money | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Overall | 6.3/10 | 7.5/10 |
Five categories to one, value tied. The one the Aura takes is battery, and it takes it on a published figure against an unpublished one. Everything else runs the way the price does.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the Flowermate Aura if the pen shape is a hard requirement and £40 is a real amount of money. You want something that lives in a pen slot and looks like nothing, you'll be medicating with sweet or balanced flower rather than auditioning terpenes, and triple-use pods for herb, concentrate and oil at £69 is a genuine feature no rival matches at the money. You accept that the mouthpiece will crack and that replacements are part of the deal. You're also, honestly, buying a second device — its own review has it living in the emergency slot, the pen in the junk drawer you're glad is there.
Buy the PAX Mini 2 if you were buying a small conduction device anyway and can stretch. It's a better vaporiser and a much better object: faster to heat, easier to clean, built from materials with no countdown running on them, and the only one of the two whose behaviour on the house control strains is actually documented. The hour-of-use battery is the price of admission and you should decide about it before you order, not after.
The wrong buyer for the Aura is anyone who'll be disappointed by thin vapour, or coming down from a desktop — its review says as much. The wrong buyer for the PAX is anyone whose main complaint is flavour, because £109 of conduction won't fix that, and its own review points at cheaper convection before you've reached the halfway mark.
How I Actually Choose
I don't, particularly. Neither of these is in my rotation in any serious way and both reviews admit it — the Aura is a specific-situations tool, the PAX is the dress shoe of the collection: not what I wear daily, the right choice for particular evenings.
What happened instead is that my partner ended up owning one of each, which is more useful data than my rotation log. Sarah keeps the Aura in her handbag's pen pocket for visits to her mum's, and she bought the PAX in Greenstone without consulting me because it was pretty and fit her clutch bag. Both stories are in the reviews and neither needs retelling here; the point is that the person in this house with no interest whatsoever in convection independently arrived at both of these, for the same reason, in two different bags.
The fresh data point is Tom. He's flying to Dublin for a stag do and asked which one to take, having held the PAX once and described it, in a whisper, as being made of crystal. I told him the Aura, and not because of the mouthpiece. Tom is going to leave whatever he takes in a seat pocket somewhere over the Irish Sea, and there's a version of that Sunday where he's £69 down and a version where he's £109 down, and only one of those is survivable on the flight home. He said that was fair. He's taking the Aura. It will not be coming back.
That's genuinely the calculation for a device this size, and it isn't a joke at Tom's expense. Small things get lost. The cheaper small thing is the one you can afford to lose.
The Verdict (The Bookend)
Nobody has ever landed in Dublin and thought about the flight.
Fifty-five minutes over the Irish Sea is fifty-five minutes over the Irish Sea; the aeroplane was never the product. What you paid the difference for was the boarding, the cabin, the bag in the fare and the reasonable expectation that nothing would go wrong in a way that costs extra. The PAX Mini 2 is the flag carrier and it wins this 7.5 to 6.3: better built, easier to clean, faster to start, faster to charge, made of things that don't crack. The £40 buys no better destination. It buys a better trip and a smaller chance of an unplanned expense.
But the budget carrier keeps two things the flag carrier can't take off it. It tells you how much fuel is on board — 2600mAh, 6–8 sessions, in writing — and it goes in a pen pocket. At 90 grams, pen-shaped, at a price that won't sting when you lose it, the Aura does the one job it was built for and charges you a takeaway for it. If the requirement is genuinely "must vanish, must be a pen, must not hurt when it goes", it's still the answer, and its 9 for portability isn't a consolation prize.
Buy the PAX if you're keeping it. Buy the Aura if you're not sure you will.
Just one more bowl.
FAQ
Flowermate Aura vs PAX Mini 2 — which should I buy? The PAX Mini 2 for most people: it scores higher (7.5 vs 6.3), is dramatically better built, cleans easily, heats in twenty-two seconds and charges in ninety minutes. Buy the Aura if pen shape is a hard requirement, if you want concentrate and oil pods included, or if £40 is the difference between buying and not buying.
Is the PAX worth £40 more when both are conduction? For build, cleaning, heat-up, charging and the absence of a known failure point, yes. For vapour quality alone, no — 6.5 against 5.0 is a real gap but it isn't a category change, and both reviews point at cheaper convection devices that beat either of them on flavour.
Which has the better battery? The Aura on score, 7.0 to 5.0. It publishes 2600mAh and delivers 6–8 sessions; PAX won't state a capacity at all and gives about an hour of real use, or seven to eight short sessions. The catch is refuelling: Micro-USB and three hours against USB-C on a magnetic dock in ninety minutes.
Does the Aura's mouthpiece really crack? Yes. It's the single most documented issue with the device and its review treats it as when, not if — reports run from a week to a few months. Budget £5–10 on an ongoing basis, clean it gently, lukewarm and briefly, and expect it to get warm from draw three.
Which is more discreet? Different kinds of discreet at effectively identical weight. The Aura hides by being ordinary — pen-shaped, reads as an e-cigarette or a biro. The PAX hides by being premium — a small aluminium block that reads as a lighter or a lipstick. For pure "nobody must ask what that is", the pen wins.
Can either do concentrates? The Aura can: three pods in the box for herb, concentrate and oil, the concentrate pod adequate and the oil pod basic but functional. Triple-use at £69 is its genuine selling point. The Mini 2 is herb only, and gets no PAX app features either.
Have both been through the site's strain test? No, and it matters. The PAX Mini 2 has run Jack Herer and Wedding Cake from the house jars; the Aura's review predates that protocol and used Papaya and a Noidecs T10:C10 instead. The comparison above is made by terpene family, and the Aura's behaviour on fragile terpinolene flower is genuinely untested rather than quietly assumed.
About Dennis M.
Dennis M. has been reviewing vaporisers and vaping daily for the best part of a decade. He works in IT, has ADHD, and uses cannabis for chronic pain management. He lives in Manchester with his partner Sarah, who owns both devices in this comparison and has never once asked what conduction means.
Dennis flies budget and has never paid to choose a seat. He accepts this undermines several paragraphs above, and would point out that he also owns the more expensive vaporiser in every comparison he writes, which he considers a separate matter entirely.
A note on spelling: 'vaporizer' is the de facto international spelling, but I've stuck with the British 'vaporiser' throughout this blog.
Questions, corrections, or a device you want tested? dennis@herbvape.co.uk
Related Content
Full Reviews: - Flowermate Aura Review: The BIC Pen of Vaporisers → - PAX Mini 2 Review: The AirPods of Vaporisers →
More Comparisons: - All head-to-heads →
New to Vaping? - The Temperature Guide → - How I score devices →
Get Them at HerbVape.co.uk {#shop}
Flowermate Aura — £69.00 Buy the Flowermate Aura → Worth grabbing with it: a small smell-proof case for the pen and its three pods, and a gentle cleaning kit — the plastic mouthpiece wants soft tools and lukewarm ISO, not enthusiasm.
PAX Mini 2 — £109.00 Not currently listed on the HerbVape store, so there's no product link here. Wherever you buy it: get the half-pack lid at the same time, and register it for the third year of warranty. Neither is optional.
Just one more bowl.
Review Policy: I buy or borrow the devices I review. HerbVape.co.uk is my employer, but my opinions are my own — they pay me to be honest, not to sell you shite. Affiliate links and discount codes exist because running a site costs money, not because they influence scores.
Strains Used: the PAX Mini 2 ran the site-wide control — Jack Herer, sativa (Haze × Northern Lights #5 × Shiva Skunk), ~20% THC, terpinolene/caryophyllene/pinene-dominant, pine-citrus-pepper profile with fragile top notes; and Wedding Cake, indica-leaning hybrid (Triangle Kush × Animal Mints, via Triangle Mints #23), ~24% THC, caryophyllene/limonene/myrcene-dominant, vanilla-cream-dough over peppery earth. The Flowermate Aura review predates that protocol and used Papaya — indica hybrid (Citral #13 × Ice #2), ~20–25% THC, myrcene/linalool/caryophyllene — and Noidecs T10:C10, balanced medical (~10% THC / 10% CBD), myrcene/caryophyllene/pinene. Comparisons above are made by terpene family and flagged where the Aura has no equivalent data. Strain effects vary by individual, batch and consumption method.
Medical & Legal Disclaimer: Nothing here constitutes medical advice, and I am not a medical professional. Cannabis is a controlled substance in the UK; medical cannabis is legal only on prescription from a registered specialist clinic. HerbVape.co.uk sells vaporiser hardware only: we do not sell, prescribe, or recommend cannabis or cannabis products. You must be 18 or over to buy one, and cannabis law varies by jurisdiction — check yours.
Last updated: 26 August 2026.